Chelsea was one of several clubs that were interested in Prising Virgil van Dijk away from Liverpool, while his contractual status was uncertain, a report said.
Van Dijk’s future remained undecided, while he was approaching the last weeks of his contract before he was late on a new deal when the season declined to conclude.
While van Dijk later insisted that it was “always Liverpool”, numerous clubs were associated with a change for the revered central defender. Paris Saint-Germain’s name came up repeatedly.
The high -towering Dutch was caught in an interview with PSG President Nasser Al Khelaifi and sports director Luis Campos in front of the camera after the French champions Liverpool had thrown out the Champions League in the past 16 years. PSG raised the rumors, but since then Chelsea has relaxed that Chelsea was interested in Van Dijk, according to van Dijk, according to van Dijk, so that, according to van Dijk, he is interested as soon as he relaxes. Posting.
The blues are said to have examined the option, but came with the overwhelming conclusion that Van Dijk had no train.
It was also assumed that Chelsea had also taken a step for Mohamed Salah before he agreed to stay in Liverpool himself. The Egyptian international, who had an unfortunate magic on the Stamford Bridge, was described as the preliminary interest in moving to West London, while Chelsea was positioned as a proactive party in the failed deal for van Dijk.
Despite her reported interest in two players who approach in the mid -1930s, Chelsea usually focused on young recruits as part of the current ownership model. No player over 25 years has been permanently drawn to Stamford Bridge since Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang arrived in the summer of 2022.
Enzo Maresca has no lack of interior defense options, although everyone has their own disadvantages, with fitness problems and reliability concerns that van Dijk was rarely forced to consider.